好汉持枪逼倒劫匪 - !

CiTY_HuNTeR

cjw065 发表于 2015-3-31 21:47
"charged with robbery by intimidation", not "armed robbery", 递了个纸条而已。
如果是我，我是不会去 ...

政府收你税，抢的更多，你怎么不去找他们要？

cjw065

CiTY_HuNTeR 发表于 2015-4-1 07:00
没看到不代表没有危险，如果你不拿枪出来只是过去制止他，这时他给你一枪可能性是很大的．有几个robber真 ...

你为什么要去制止他呢？

cjw065

CiTY_HuNTeR 发表于 2015-4-1 07:01
政府收你税，抢的更多，你怎么不去找他们要？

你扯得太远了。不要有了枪就把自己当警察。
http://banking.about.com/od/securityandsafety/a/bankrobbery.htm
Here is the part that everybody should know, "Every law enforcement official will tell you the same thing: the most heroic act you should take in a bank robbery is to notice details about the robber. It is extremely risky to (yourself and others) to try to stop the robbery by force. Keep in mind that an increasing number of bank robbers are using powerful drugs (cocaine and methamphetamine, for example) during the robbery. You don’t want to take chances with an intoxicated person in a desperate situation – it’s simply not worth all of the money in the world."

Read and learn, my friend.

herdinor

cjw065 发表于 2015-4-1 08:07
你扯得太远了。不要有了枪就把自己当警察。
http://banking.about.com/od/securityandsafety/a/bankrobbe ...

同意这句话。不要因为有枪就以为自己是警察。只有事后被没完没了的官司缠上，弄得自己倾家荡产才知道后果的严重性。

Phante

老汉之勇 不愿苛责 不过不提倡这样的行为 除非别人真的对你的性命造成威胁  PS. 这年头敢这样对天使的人不多啊...

CiTY_HuNTeR

cjw065 发表于 2015-4-1 11:00
你为什么要去制止他呢？

这就是看各人了，我也认为如果只是抢钱没有威胁人身安全的话没必要管．但既然管了，就别让自己后悔．再说后悔也得有命才能后悔

CiTY_HuNTeR

cjw065 发表于 2015-4-1 11:07
你扯得太远了。不要有了枪就把自己当警察。
http://banking.about.com/od/securityandsafety/a/bankrobber ...

我哪句说有枪就要当cop了？只是就事论事，你说银行抢劫，那我就说另一个更大的劫匪咯，可惜那个你不敢惹而已．

任何上过ccw的都知道枪是保护生命安全的，而不是保护财产的，所以我一直没说鼓励这么做．老头多管闲事是一码事，但既然管了，有枪不用就是有病．当然可以事后诸葛，说没有charge armed robbery，bla bla bla，但当时的情况不知道有没有枪，就要认为有．这是无数cop用生命换回来的教训．

CiTY_HuNTeR

Phante 发表于 2015-4-1 12:51
老汉之勇 不愿苛责 不过不提倡这样的行为 除非别人真的对你的性命造成威胁  PS. 这年头敢这样对天使的人不 ...

同意，不提倡，但既然有人做了，没必要再上去踩一脚说别人的不是

cjw065

CiTY_HuNTeR 发表于 2015-4-1 09:57
同意，不提倡，但既然有人做了，没必要再上去踩一脚说别人的不是

老兄头脑发热脾气火爆，加看贴不仔细。

CiTY_HuNTeR

cjw065 发表于 2015-4-1 13:04
老兄头脑发热脾气火爆，加看贴不仔细。

到此为止，啥也不说了

cjw065

呵呵，讨论是需要的，互相学习，共同进步。
有不同意见是正常情况，这样才叫讨论。没有不同意见的那叫附和。

rockmount

不是老头太单纯，而是这个世界被搞得太复杂，让正义的行为付代价。

冬天不冷226

Perry Singh ·  Top Commenter · South Seattle Community College
Nobodies life was in danger once the bank robber left and was on his way out. I admire the intent of this citizen and it certainly scores points for gun rights. But this is not self defense. Even bank armed security will not do this. They are trained only to protect life not property. My personal opinion is robbing a bank as long as it's non violent is a victimless crime. The bank doesn't lose a penny and neither does any customer. He should have let the guy go if he was fleeing.
Reply · Like · 2 · Follow Post · 21 hours ago

helloterran

冬天不冷226 发表于 2015-4-2 10:58
Perry Singh ·  Top Commenter · South Seattle Community College
Nobodies life was in danger once t ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cit ... ates#State_statutes

Common law[edit]
Most states have codified the common law rule that a warrantless arrest may be made by a private person for a felony, misdemeanor or "breach of peace".[1] A breach of peace covers a multitude of crimes in which the Supreme Court has even included a misdemeanor seatbelt violation punishable only by a fine. The term historically included theft, "nightwalking", prostitution and playing card and dice games.[2]

State statutes[edit]
California Penal Code section 837 is a good example of this codification:

837. A private person may arrest another:

For a public offense committed or attempted in his/her presence.
When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in his presence.
When a felony has been in fact committed, and he or she has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it.

CADET

rockmount 发表于 2015-4-1 10:28
不是老头太单纯，而是这个世界被搞得太复杂，让正义的行为付代价。

同意