枪友会

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 入门 指南 攻略
查看: 4863|回复: 12

[经验分享] 最佳家防用手枪和口径?

[复制链接]

31

主题

289

帖子

4821

积分

高级枪友

Rank: 2

积分
4821

三枪客NRA终身会员

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-5-13 15:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 erdos 于 2014-5-13 23:58 编辑

是啥?大家议议?
不说shotgun - 就限制在手枪范围内。

我先抛砖引玉:


考虑因素:
结构设计可靠,操作简单;
安全维持上膛状态;
停止力强;穿透性低;后座不过大;
枪大小:不过小而失去威力和准头,也不过大而失去灵活性。


综上:
DA revolver;
.357Mag, or .45 colt;
medium or large frame, 4~6 inch barrel.

可选:
S&W 686
RugerGP100

96

主题

438

帖子

5934

积分

高级枪友

Rank: 2

积分
5934

三枪客携枪执照

沙发
发表于 2014-5-13 16:41 | 只看该作者
非357左轮莫属
一碟花生米,二两老白干,三两猪头肉。
回复

使用道具 举报

265

主题

1万

帖子

9万

积分

国宝枪友

Rank: 5Rank: 5

积分
93090

NRA终身会员携枪执照

板凳
发表于 2014-5-13 16:42 来自手机 | 只看该作者
流浪枪手 发表于 2014-5-13 16:41
非357左轮莫属

今天又被震到了。哎。。。。
回复

使用道具 举报

228

主题

2410

帖子

3万

积分

版主

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
34292

三枪客

地板
发表于 2014-5-13 16:49 | 只看该作者
对于没枪的老中,买的第一把手枪就是最佳家防手枪和口径。
回复

使用道具 举报

1172

主题

2万

帖子

13万

积分

国宝枪友

少林寺驻武当山办事处大神父上校政委王喇嘛

Rank: 5Rank: 5

积分
132169

开坛元勋NRA终身会员三枪客认证教员携枪执照

5#
发表于 2014-5-13 17:08 | 只看该作者
practice, practice, practice.

除了把手头的枪练好以外,没别的办法。练好了semiauto也可靠,扣不响马上拉slide排弹。
When You're Up To Your Nose In Shit, Keep Your Mouth Shut. -Jack Beauregard
回复

使用道具 举报

282

主题

1万

帖子

6万

积分

版主

蝙蝠

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
65691

开坛元勋NRA终身会员认证教员携枪执照

6#
发表于 2014-5-13 17:21 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 brucewayne 于 2014-5-13 20:32 编辑

There is really no noticeable/notable difference in wounding capability between 9mm,.40 S&W and .45 ACP....

So why 9mm ?

1. Recoil control
2. Magazine capacity
3. Effective ballistic characteristics with premium defensive ammo.
4. More efficient balance of speed and precision. (More combat effective shots on target in a smaller length of time).

Don't fall into the mythical "One shot Stop" trap

Features
Stopping Power: Myths, Legends, and Realities
When it comes to claims about the effectiveness of handgun ammo, don't believe the hype.

   243
January 16, 2013  |  by Sydney Vail, MD

Photo courtesy of Sydney Vail
Photo courtesy of Sydney Vail
As a trauma surgeon and a tactical medical specialist, I am often asked by law enforcement officers what caliber and type of handgun ammunition offers the most stopping power. I can't answer that question. Let me explain why.

The ammunition most commonly carried by law enforcement officers is a hollow-point configuration or expanding full metal jacket bullet, typically in one of five calibers, including .38/.357, 9mm, .357 SIG, .40 S&W,  and .45 ACP. Other calibers are used in some departments. But for the sake of this discussion, let's stick with the most common rounds. These handgun rounds perform very differently based on a number of key factors that I'd like to discuss.

At most agencies it is typical for either the rangemaster or lead firearms trainer to choose specific ammunition (caliber and/or bullet type) based on the results of ammunition being run through a series of ballistic tests, most commonly the FBI's ballistic laboratory testing. Marketing by ammunition companies also influences how agencies choose the specific ammunition for front line officers to carry.

Unfortunately, the information that agencies are using to choose the ammo for their officers is generally based on hype as well as the flawed standardized testing using ballistic gel and measurements of the depth of penetration into ballistic gel, degree of bullet expansion, and other factors. Usually, actual data on human body wound ballistics is not available to agencies when they are choosing ammo for their officers.

What is most unfortunate is that the testing of modern bullets does not give a complete picture of what a particular ammunition configuration will do in the human body to incapacitate it in a timely fashion, in other words, stopping power. The testing results "infer" or "simulate" what is believed to happen in the human body, but I can tell you that from my experience operating on gunshot patients that this just is not the case.

So back to the question at hand about determining stopping power. If you are expecting me to tell you which brand and which bullet caliber and type to use for the best or most reliable stopping power, you are going to be disappointed. But I will tell you about the factors that determine stopping power.

Kinetic Energy

Most officers think that a larger bullet and higher velocity equal more "kinetic" energy, yielding more stopping power than a smaller bullet with the same velocity. Here's the reality:

We know that the equation for kinetic energy is KE = ½mv2 (KE is kinetic energy, m is mass of object, and v2 is velocity squared). This equation tells us how much energy will be derived from a combination of bullet grain weight and muzzle velocity.

Now we need to go back a step and define stopping power. Is it the ability of a particular ammunition to:

Immediately incapacitate a threat?
Eventually incapacitate a threat?
Slow down a threat?
Render a person less able to remain a threat?
Knock the threat to the ground?
I believe the definition of stopping power should be a particular ammunition's effectiveness to render a person unable to offer resistance or remain a threat to the officer, an intended victim, or self.

So how does ammunition accomplish this? You have two options. You can use a really large round at very high velocity like the 30mm cannon rounds from an Apache helicopter's M230 Chain Gun, which produces substantial kinetic energy, or you can place your shot where it has the most effect. Obviously, shot placement is the only realistic option for a law enforcement officer.

A .40 caliber bullet shot into the shirtless torso of a person causes a degree of injury due to the body absorbing the bullet's energy and dispersing it in front of and around the path of the bullet. The projectile also tears through the tissue. This means that the kinetic energy of this typically low-velocity (less than 1,500 feet per second) bullet will create both a permanent cavity and to a much lesser extent a temporary cavity.

But does this ammunition have acceptable stopping power? Only if it hits a vital structure that would "stop" the target from continuing the fight.

The Target Variable

Consider that the same ammunition shot into the torso of an officer wearing a ballistic vest involves the same forces, but they are dispersed over a greater surface area in order to dissipate those forces, which, hopefully, prevents penetration of the body and allows the officer to continue in the fight.

So is the stopping power the same or different for these two scenarios? The kinetic energy is the same, the tissue injury is different.

Another way to look at this is to think about a bowling ball as a projectile and how it might perform in two different scenarios. If someone shoots it out of a cannon into a brick wall, the large mass and high velocity will likely result in a significant hole in that wall. But if the same bowling ball is shot out of a cannon into a strong net made of Kevlar, it will likely have all of its energy taken up by the net and not allow penetration. It has the same energy to lose in its intended target but different targets yield different results. A bowling ball fired from a cannon has high kinetic energy and excellent stopping power that far exceeds any ammo you could carry on duty, but the effect it has on the target is still determined by shot placement and the nature of the target.

Real Gunshot Wounds

The point here is that no single ammunition that is typically used by law enforcement officers today can reliably claim to have superior stopping power.

I have seen a .22 caliber bullet completely incapacitate someone and a .45 ACP fail to achieve that result. People and animals shot with 10mm rounds and .357 SIG rounds have continued to run from the police. I have been on scene as a tactical medical provider when a suicidal person shot himself in the head with a .45 Colt round resulting in instant death. And I have seen the same results in suicides that used smaller calibers, including .22, .25, and .32. I have also seen people hit with 9mm, .40, and .45 without so much as staggering or slowing their verbal or physical activities.

So we come back to the original question: Which ammunition has the best stopping power? I can't answer that question. What I can say is that you should look for ammunition that reliably lives up to its claims of penetration and expansion but don't believe that these two factors alone are related to stopping power.

The ultimate stopping power rests with your training with your weapon system. Accurate hits in any reasonable caliber will "stop" a person if that person has experienced enough brain or spinal cord damage to interrupt regular neurologic impulses from reaching vital areas of the body or the person has hemorrhaged enough blood to lower his or her blood pressure where the brain no longer is able to function well. You can also stop a person if a major bone shatters after a bullet injures it, but does that stop the fight?

Stopping power is a marketing tool and should be dropped from our discussions of ballistic performance until such time as ammunition effectiveness is measured by more means than just the results of gelatin and barrier tests. When ammunition companies or regulatory agencies begin to use computer simulations, simulant tests, animal models, autopsy results, and trauma surgeon operation reports with hospital summaries to determine the effectiveness of their products, then we will know which ammunition can be labeled as having the "best stopping power." And this claim will be based on scientific data rather than incomplete ballistic testing.

Until then, shot placement with any commercially available ammunition will offer you the best chance of maximizing your duty ammunition's stopping power.

Sydney Vail MD, FACS, is an associate professor of surgery on the trauma faculty at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and Penn State College of Medicine in Hershey, Pa. He also serves as director of tactical medicine programs for the Arizona Department of Public Safety and Maricopa County (Ariz.) Sheriff's Office SWAT teams.
回复

使用道具 举报

1172

主题

2万

帖子

13万

积分

国宝枪友

少林寺驻武当山办事处大神父上校政委王喇嘛

Rank: 5Rank: 5

积分
132169

开坛元勋NRA终身会员三枪客认证教员携枪执照

7#
发表于 2014-5-13 18:31 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 CiTY_HuNTeR 于 2014-5-13 21:49 编辑
brucewayne 发表于 2014-5-13 20:21
There is really no noticeable/notable difference in wounding capability between 9mm,.40 S&W and .45  ...

没difference?同样jhp,40,45躺着进ER,9mm走着进,我觉得是有区别的。当然,shot placement最重要对任何caliber都一样。
When You're Up To Your Nose In Shit, Keep Your Mouth Shut. -Jack Beauregard
回复

使用道具 举报

282

主题

1万

帖子

6万

积分

版主

蝙蝠

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
65691

开坛元勋NRA终身会员认证教员携枪执照

8#
发表于 2014-5-13 18:44 | 只看该作者
CiTY_HuNTeR 发表于 2014-5-13 21:31
没difference?同样jhp,40,45躺着进ER,9mm走着进,我觉得是有区别的

上文为引用,不是我自身原创观点
回复

使用道具 举报

28

主题

695

帖子

4792

积分

高级枪友

大多

Rank: 2

积分
4792
9#
发表于 2014-5-14 09:03 | 只看该作者
看LZ所在地了,有弹匣弹量限制的地方就用最大威力的弹头,比如.45ACP;没有弹匣限制的话就用capacity高的,比如9mm。
回复

使用道具 举报

2

主题

1542

帖子

1万

积分

老牌枪友

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
11888
10#
发表于 2014-5-15 14:18 | 只看该作者
CiTY_HuNTeR 发表于 2014-5-13 21:31
没difference?同样jhp,40,45躺着进ER,9mm走着进,我觉得是有区别的。当然,shot placement最重要对任 ...

penetration和temporary cavity可能是差不多,permanent cavity在有弹性地组织收缩后也许差别也不大,但口径大的顺着带掉的和打烂掉的肉就是多,9mm和.45原来弹头直径就差2.5mm,但JHP展开后口径大的弹头还是比口径小的多出不少。当然9mm比.45多出近一倍的弹容量和更容易控制也可以有自己的优势。
回复

使用道具 举报

1172

主题

2万

帖子

13万

积分

国宝枪友

少林寺驻武当山办事处大神父上校政委王喇嘛

Rank: 5Rank: 5

积分
132169

开坛元勋NRA终身会员三枪客认证教员携枪执照

11#
发表于 2014-5-15 14:20 | 只看该作者
bigbore 发表于 2014-5-15 17:18
penetration和temporary cavity可能是差不多,permanent cavity在有弹性地组织收缩后也许差别也不大,但 ...

所以40是属于高不成低不就,既没有45那么大,有没有9mm携弹多。也可以反过来说,弹孔比9mm大,携弹比45多(除了FNX那个异类),所以我carry 40
When You're Up To Your Nose In Shit, Keep Your Mouth Shut. -Jack Beauregard
回复

使用道具 举报

228

主题

2410

帖子

3万

积分

版主

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
34292

三枪客

12#
发表于 2014-5-17 04:02 | 只看该作者
CiTY_HuNTeR 发表于 2014-5-15 17:20
所以40是属于高不成低不就,既没有45那么大,有没有9mm携弹多。也可以反过来说,弹孔比9mm大,携弹比45多 ...

反过来说 有道理。不过这样就又回到brucewaye的点上--大家都好所以各有优势没有第一。
回复

使用道具 举报

1172

主题

2万

帖子

13万

积分

国宝枪友

少林寺驻武当山办事处大神父上校政委王喇嘛

Rank: 5Rank: 5

积分
132169

开坛元勋NRA终身会员三枪客认证教员携枪执照

13#
发表于 2014-5-17 04:12 | 只看该作者
TFollowerII 发表于 2014-5-17 07:02
反过来说 有道理。不过这样就又回到brucewaye的点上--大家都好所以各有优势没有第一。 ...

有些小区别。40后座力很急,新手可能比较难控制。9mm后座快但力量小,45总体后座力量大,但来的柔和,这俩习惯了都比40好打。不过正是40这个特性,我才选择它carry,因为习惯了以后40可以打得很快,而且double tap时候也很有节奏,第一枪后的sight recover快(当然不是一种枪,比较的是92和M&P)
When You're Up To Your Nose In Shit, Keep Your Mouth Shut. -Jack Beauregard
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

触屏版|枪友会

GMT-8, 2024-5-14 23:38 , Processed in 0.044521 second(s), 19 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表