|
按道理最高院完全可以直接否决了德州这个法案。德州自己的辩护律师都承认了该法案通过后任何权利都会处于危险之中。但问题是现在这几个右逼法官为了派系之争,完全置法制于不顾。
Texas Solicitor General Judd Stone argued that the state was well within its right to codify a law designed to evade federal oversight. The implications of this, however, seemed to bother a majority of the court: If Texas could do an end run around a constitutional right that it disfavored, what would stop other states from employing the same sort of legal maneuvering to single out rights they didn’t care for? Stone admitted that if Texas was successful, thenall rights would essentially be up for grabs.
https://theintercept.com/2021/12/11/abortion-supreme-court-ruling-texas-sb8/
这个先例一开,以后的联邦法院的判决就是一纸空文。比如马上要开审的纽约携枪案,本来我还很期待。但现在也没啥意义了,就算这几个右逼判了NYC输掉,NYC也可以立马照着德州的龌龊搞法,不仅让携枪甚至让买枪都无法进行。
如果最高院这几个右逼真要一心放水的话,那维护美国法制的重任居然讽刺性的落在了左逼身上了。如果左逼坚守自己的理念,维护红州妇女堕胎权,就可以在德州案最后裁决前,像加州那样通过一系列同样操作的禁枪案,逼最高院作抉择。如果左逼阴损一点,现在不采取任何行动,任由德州法案通过后,再在自己州内依葫芦画瓢禁枪,禁言论自由等等,美国就好玩了。
|
|