|
|
本帖最后由 双筒 于 2021-4-22 18:23 编辑
差不多吧，只要子弹打中了熊，哪怕是大个的grizzly棕熊，哪怕是用点22那样弱的口径，也还是有很高的成功率。 我上面21楼引用的那个ammoland的文章，2019年他们更新了，现在总共搜集到73个手枪对熊的自卫事件，70个成功，3个失败，成功率现在是96%。 这里面有了5个点22打熊的例子：
--
We found five cases involving a .22 rimfire pistol. Four were successful, against black bears. One failed against a polar bear （5个点22LR对熊的自卫案例，4个成功的是打黑熊，1个失败的，是打北极熊的。 第一个例子把黑熊打死了，但没详细内容，打了几发等等。 第二个例子非常详细，总共打了18发子弹才把熊停止了，中间还有个reload，还有两条狗帮忙。 18发里14发命中了，其中两发是致命伤。 可见用点22打黑熊还是太勉强了。 最后一个例子是个奇迹，点22只打了一发，黑熊跑了40码，倒地毙命）
--
We found one case involving a .380 pistol. It was successful. （这个例子里熊虽然没打死，给吓跑了，但打的是个350磅+的大号黑熊。 开枪者说虽然只打了两枪，但我知道肯定打中了，熊站起来了，跟你我一边儿高）
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/handgun-or-pistol-defense-against-bear-attack-73-cases-96-effective/
至于说到枪械对熊跟熊喷来比较哪个更有效，网上鲜有这样的文章，我找到一个，觉得比较中立，因为作者引用了5篇网上的文章来分析，包括上面ammoland的2019年的文章。 其中有一篇是故意玩数字游戏想贬低枪械对熊自卫的成功率的（原文作者说只有76%），作者分析了那篇文章，说明如果apple vs apple的对比，枪械成功率实际上是96%。 特别指出如果熊喷成功了，有一半左右的熊是当时跑了，过一会儿又回来找你麻烦的，你那喷子就空瓶了。。。
这是这篇文章最后的总结：
Conclusions
For safety against bear attacks:
- Stick to areas with good visibility. Many attacks start because the person and/or bear weren't aware of how close they were to each other.
- Travel in a group of 3 or more, even when going to the bathroom. The more people around, the less likely a bear will attack.
- Hunting in bear country? Carry a pistol. You're the most at-risk.
- Dogs are not reliable protection against bears.
- Firearms are actually about 96% effective at stopping bears, but one must be proficient and select the right ammo.
- Hollow-point ammo doesn't work on bears. Pick penetrators instead.
- Pepper spray is better vs. curious bears (~85%) than aggressive ones (~75%). （就是说对一心想杀你的熊，喷子的效果差）
- Injury rates are about the same for firearms and pepper spray users.
https://pistolwizard.com/studies/bears |
|
[复制链接]
发表于 2021-4-20 18:47
