Ebola可以通过空气传播

Hohenstaufenz

Foxnews...yeah right...

Hohenstaufenz

davidlee1 发表于 2014-10-13 21:48
cnn 是不是更可信一些？

Hate CNN all we want, but when it comes down to matters of science, I'd rather side with CNN than Fox News, which is known for promoting denial, bigotry and ignorance. This is the only reason why I find a lot of (luckily not all) Republican candidates repulsive.

Hohenstaufenz

davidlee1 发表于 2014-10-15 11:42
Here is another ebola movie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreak_(film)
Even Hollywood knows how ...

That was one freaking scary movie. I still have nightmares from watching it many many years ago...

Hohenstaufenz

davidlee1 发表于 2014-10-16 15:32
"就被Jon Stewart 笑过"
这很成问题吗？how about just give one specific incident so we can all see ho ...

How's your airborne Ebola doing by the way? 我这么久不愿意回复你为何Fox News 在科学问题上就是一垃圾桶的原因是因为1）是否airborne需要时间的佐证 2）不管我提出多么确切的实例你自己不愿意接受那我也是浪费时间，而时间恰恰是科学和医学最权威的检测机制。政治归政治，科学归科学，CNN虽然不代表我们拥枪者的利益，但Fox这种否定全球气候变暖和宏观进化论的主流新闻频道也绝对不应该成为一个人的科学观念的主要来源。事情要分开来看，case by case,一股脑地只奉一个声音为真理那跟疯狂的红卫兵有何两样？一味只听从一个声音那又跟古代的昏君有何两样？对于Fox news 在科学/医学上的观点，you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time. 而这恰恰也能很好地概括科学自己的检测机制。而关于Ebola是否会airborne 这种严肃地讨论，你既然这么反感那些好莱坞的liberal，那为何还要拿他们的科学恐怖电影来当作自己的论据呢？电影归电影，我们一些人对于ebola是否已经或者可能在过去的几个月变成airborne持保守怀疑态度是因为缺乏任何的molecular and clinical evidence, 但你要拿电影来给我们扣上self-denial的liberal帽子, 那就实在是让人不屑一顾了。Spare me your sarcasm, I don't give a damn.