号外：CCW 好消息！

平日

看了新闻，说句公道话，链接中说有的人超速吃罚单没出庭，进而被禁止买枪，这应该合情合理吧？
如果一个人不尊重法律，那么怎么能相信他能合法持枪呢？换个角度来说超速本来就是违法行为，更何况这里还是那些超速被抓且拒不出庭的人。

平日

东区小刀 发表于 2017-12-7 10:56
交罚款了没？高速路上好像没人不超速

至少我看那个连接里面引用的例子都是超速后，被抓，然后被开罚单，并且没有出庭且拒付罚金的人。

The Department of Justice reported in 2012 that 19.1% of denials (13,862) were as a result of being a “fugitive from Justice.”

被拒的理由就是“逃犯”，只是这个“逃犯”的内容看似都很低级而已：

Ryan, who was denied a gun purchase by NICS. Upon appealing his denial, he said, “the only thing [my attorney] can find is that i have a bench warrent [sic] from Ohio for failure to appear for a traffic ticket.”

所以我承认至少在 CA，大部分高速上的车都在超速，但是极少部分被警察 pull over，这些被 pull over 的人也不是都被开了罚单，即便是被开了罚单，出庭认错，交罚金了事也没问题，关键是这些例子里面的人都是拒不出庭，且不交罚金，才会被提交到 NICS 被当做“fugitive from Justice.”，感觉拒绝这部分人合法持枪没什么问题。

平日

sig2013 发表于 2017-12-7 10:55
不出庭不算违法吧。只是自动放弃为自己辩护的机会。

超速案子，警察也可能不出庭。这种情况法官一般会判 ...

不出庭不是犯罪，但是你罚金得交吧？
例子里面的人都是在外州吃罚单，拒出庭，但是罚金没交才被划到 fugitive:

Ryan, who was denied a gun purchase by NICS. Upon appealing his denial, he said, “the only thing [my attorney] can find is that i have a bench warrent [sic] from Ohio for failure to appear for a traffic ticket.”

this gun buyer who, in posting to a “General Firearms Forum,” said he was denied and, upon appeal, “got a letter in the mail saying I had an outstanding warrant for a traffic ticket out of state from 6 years ago.”