枪友会

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 入门 指南 攻略
楼主: FJC

2016皮卡IIHS碰撞测试成绩最新出炉

[复制链接]

52

主题

844

帖子

1万

积分

老牌枪友

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
13949
楼主
发表于 2016-4-12 06:30 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 TofuSan 于 2016-4-12 06:40 编辑

All these tests against rigid barrier are similar to one vehicle hitting an identical vehicle (itself), thus performance is normalized by the mass of the vehicle. However at the end of the day, mass trumps many other factors in vehicle-vehicle collision. A heavier vehicle most likely will win, according to Newton's laws.  A pickup with "Marginal" ratings is likely to fair pretty well in a crash with a small car with "Good" ratings, transferring more energy to the low mass vehicle. Even IIHS admitts that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExQUGk12S8U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCelD0qr8Do

Man, it's like an arms race. Drive the heaviest car/truck you can afford to drive.




评分

参与人数 1子弹 +100 收起 理由
thurder + 100 agreed.

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

52

主题

844

帖子

1万

积分

老牌枪友

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
13949
沙发
发表于 2016-4-14 08:04 | 显示全部楼层
HRQYH 发表于 2016-4-13 14:01
那種論調,工業化時代是對的。現在,用統計學的實驗設計,保證了你在花了大量的時間,大量的金錢之後,不 ...

I tend to agree with you. Looking forward to fully autonomus vehicle fleets.

For now, I'll still buy the heaviest and strongest vehicle budget (including fuel cost) allows.  
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

触屏版|枪友会

GMT-8, 2024-5-16 03:02 , Processed in 0.032364 second(s), 19 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表