|
|
回帖奖励 +10
@Hohenstaufenz
请问你有没有研究Trophy Match？为什么没有选Trophy Match？
附近的枪店都没有这两把，想拿在手里掂掂都没办法。
看评论好像和TRP价钱极近，规格极像，基本上是个人喜好的取舍。
看完了几个网站的评论，似乎TRP略优。
It's the same gun with different sights.
The TRP is also available with or without the rail.
If it's going to be specifically a range gun, then the trophy match makes more sense.
I have both.
The Trophy Match is the better range gun because of the adj. sights.
The TRP would make a good CCW gun.
The accuracy medal goes to the Trophy Match, I think because of the better sights.
Well, I don't like all black sights. But be aware that the TRP has crappy sights.
The night sights do not have white circles around them - but rather a little silver circle.
AT my indoor range, I found them very hard to see.
It wasn't dark enough to see the tritium yet, but too dark to see the silver circles.
They are similar but if you are planning on using it for a carry gun or home defense take this into consideration.
Tactical Response Pisol vs. Trophy Match
Combat Night Sights vs. Steel Target Sights
Teflon Armory Kote vs. Polished Stainless Steel (very reflective)
Durable G10 Grips vs. Cocobolo Wood Grips
Unless you plan on buying one of these 1911s purely for target shooting or collecting I would DEFINITELY go with the TRP. Hope this was of some help.
I have examine many Trophy Matches and TRPs' and I'd get the TRP in every case.
Both are production 1911s', but the TRPs' are better fitted and finished.
Well worth the extra money for the TRP. I almost didn't get a Professional my TRP is so good.
Not a whole heck of a lot diff between the two.
I have both. Will part with neither.
I shoot my TRP OP much more than my TM. I like the bull barrel more.
Sandbagged at 25 yards, the TRP groups slightly better. The TM has a slightly better trigger.
Both are excellent pistols, but if I had to choose between the two, the TRP would stay over the TM.
Let me opine as a Mil Spec owner and as one who is considering a TRP, as I think this makes me very very qualified to flap my yapper.
Yes it's worth twice as much while the "twice as good" part is debatable (is a home intruder twice as dead if you shoot him with a TRP versus a Mil Spec?). Still I think a TRP is certainly better by any measure.
Here's why I think so, and I'm sure those of you who own both can add to my list of reasons.
The TRP has the full package of modern features that have become accepted as improvements on top of the basic 1911 design (big exception in my mind is the full-length guide rod -- NOT considered an improvement by some grizzled gunsmiths and 1911 pistoleros). After enough shooting with a GI grip safety, I know why a beavertail safety is desirable. I know the small GI thumb safety could be and HAS BEEN improved upon. I know there are better sights for 1911s than GI and Mil Spec sights. I know my Mil Spec's accuracy beyond 7 and 10 yards is not spectacular; a TRP will print tighter groups at those ranges and beyond because of tighter slide to frame fit, better fitting barrel bushing, better and more precise everything. The trigger guts are more finely fitted (I THINK they are based on dry firing at gun counters and first-hand reports from others, I haven't actually examined TRP trigger guts YET), hence a crisper action than lower-end 1911s.
Springfield can sell TRPs for the price they do because plenty of people will pay the price. It's more than just marketing hype, there is discernable quality to back up the higher price. The actual value is precisely what the market will pay, nothing more, nothing less. And the market pays about twice as much as the price of a Mil Spec.
|
|
[复制链接]
发表于 2014-9-1 08:43
楼主
我这么厚道，TRP那么好你换了不吃亏么
继续消化